白日梦与诗

白日梦与诗

HomeArchives

How to respond to trolls?

#沟通#喷子#吵架160
AI Translation
This post is translated from Chinese into English through AI.View Original
AI-generated summary
The content discusses how to respond to online trolls, based on a video featuring a person named Dabin. Key points include: 1. Acknowledging that personal feelings shape perceptions; adding "you feel" validates one's opinion. 2. While not agreeing with the content, one can respect the perspective of others when they express it as their own. 3. Many opinions are not based on thorough analysis, so individuals should represent only themselves in discussions. 4. Disliking someone is valid, but it doesn't affect the other person's feelings. 5. As long as interactions adhere to platform rules and avoid personal attacks, all opinions are acceptable. 6. The speaker emphasizes the importance of maintaining a positive atmosphere and not letting anger affect one's well-being. 7. The speaker reassures angry commenters that they are not significant in their lives, encouraging them to stay calm. 8. The speaker reflects on the transient nature of online interactions, suggesting that there's no need for anger over brief exchanges.

How to Respond to Trolls?#

This content comes from a video where Dabin and his haters had a live chat,

I have no feelings towards Dabin himself, but I agree with the content of his replies below.

I have excerpted a few of his statements from the video.

  1. As long as you add the words "you feel," everything you say is valid.

Because in this world, there is nothing greater than an individual's subjective perception.

Others have no need or obligation to change you; as long as you add the words "you feel," then everything is correct.

  1. I do not agree with the content of what you are saying.

I agree with you from your perspective, as long as you add the words "you feel" to everything you say.

  1. Most of the time, these three words are probably not conclusions drawn from your meticulous data organization, so I think if you are representing yourself as an individual, you can just represent yourself when sharing relevant information with another individual.

Because if you are representing yourself, then what you say is correct.

  1. You say you don't like me, but I don't care whether you like me or not.

However, the fact that you don't like me must be correct.

  1. It's like this, buddy, as long as you come up here, don't violate the platform's rules, and don't engage in personal attacks, I can accept everything I just mentioned.

You see, I keep emphasizing to you that everything you say is correct, so what else do you want to do?

  1. In summary, everything you say to me is fine, okay?

Because my main core belief is: I don't like you being too angry late at night, because it's very late, and you don't have to stay up as long as I do, and you shouldn't go to bed angry; there's no need to make yourself upset.

So you see, I keep trying; I want you to be a little happier.

I think nothing makes a person happier than being acknowledged by someone.

  1. (Comforting the angry netizen) Don't be angry, I'm not an important person to you, I don't eat your family's rice, I'm not important to you, don't be angry, okay?

  2. (Advising the netizen) How deep do you think our life connection can be? It's possible that in this lifetime, we only chat this once and say these words once.

In my life, my perception is that you are a passerby; in my life, we may only have this few minutes of intersection, so there's no need for me to be angry with you; ultimately, it's something that isn't important to me.

Loading...
Ownership of this post data is guaranteed by blockchain and smart contracts to the creator alone.